Skip to content

imagesLoaded vs Masonry

Based on 11 and 107 real audits

View imagesLoaded details | View Masonry details
MetricimagesLoadedMasonryWinner
Performance4847imagesLoaded
Accessibility8385Masonry
Best Practices9188imagesLoaded
SEO9390imagesLoaded
Security6665imagesLoaded
TTFB364ms504msimagesLoaded
Composite7474Tie
Performance
imagesLoaded
48
Masonry
47
Accessibility
imagesLoaded
83
Masonry
85
Security
imagesLoaded
66
Masonry
65
SEO
imagesLoaded
93
Masonry
90
Composite
imagesLoaded
74
Masonry
74

imagesLoaded outperforms Masonry in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Masonry leads in accessibility.

When to choose imagesLoaded

Choose imagesLoaded when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Masonry

Choose Masonry when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 11 audited imagesLoaded sites and 107 audited Masonry sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, imagesLoaded or Masonry?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, imagesLoaded sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, imagesLoaded or Masonry?
imagesLoaded sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, imagesLoaded or Masonry?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Masonry (85 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, imagesLoaded or Masonry?
imagesLoaded sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), imagesLoaded or Masonry?
imagesLoaded sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 504 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose imagesLoaded or Masonry for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. imagesLoaded scores higher on overall composite score while imagesLoaded may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback