Skip to content

Integral Ad Science vs Open Graph

Based on 34 and 3415 real audits

View Integral Ad Science details | View Open Graph details
MetricIntegral Ad ScienceOpen GraphWinner
Performance3545Open Graph
Accessibility8889Open Graph
Best Practices8387Open Graph
SEO9392Integral Ad Science
Security6566Open Graph
TTFB274ms365msIntegral Ad Science
Composite7274Open Graph
Performance
Integral Ad Science
35
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Integral Ad Science
88
Open Graph
89
Security
Integral Ad Science
65
Open Graph
66
SEO
Integral Ad Science
93
Open Graph
92
Composite
Integral Ad Science
72
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Integral Ad Science in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Integral Ad Science leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Integral Ad Science

Choose Integral Ad Science when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 34 audited Integral Ad Science sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Integral Ad Science or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Integral Ad Science or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Integral Ad Science or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Integral Ad Science or Open Graph?
Integral Ad Science sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Integral Ad Science or Open Graph?
Integral Ad Science sites show lower Time to First Byte (274 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Integral Ad Science or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Integral Ad Science may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback