| Metric | Intercom | Tilda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 64 | Tilda |
| Accessibility | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 83 | 100 | Tilda |
| SEO | 88 | 96 | Tilda |
| Security | 65 | 61 | Intercom |
| TTFB | 166ms | 217ms | Intercom |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Tilda |
Tilda outperforms Intercom in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Intercom leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Intercom when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tilda when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 24 audited Intercom sites and 4 audited Tilda sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback