Skip to content

Ionicons vs Raphael

Based on 13 and 12 real audits

View Ionicons details | View Raphael details
MetricIoniconsRaphaelWinner
Performance5460Raphael
Accessibility7472Ionicons
Best Practices9395Raphael
SEO9388Ionicons
Security6973Raphael
TTFB704ms545msRaphael
Composite7676Tie
Performance
Ionicons
54
Raphael
60
Accessibility
Ionicons
74
Raphael
72
Security
Ionicons
69
Raphael
73
SEO
Ionicons
93
Raphael
88
Composite
Ionicons
76
Raphael
76

Raphael outperforms Ionicons in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Ionicons leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Ionicons

Choose Ionicons when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Raphael

Choose Raphael when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited Ionicons sites and 12 audited Raphael sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Ionicons or Raphael?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Raphael sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 54 on average).
Which has better security, Ionicons or Raphael?
Raphael sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ionicons or Raphael?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ionicons (74 vs 72). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ionicons or Raphael?
Ionicons sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ionicons or Raphael?
Raphael sites show lower Time to First Byte (545 ms vs 704 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ionicons or Raphael for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Raphael scores higher on overall composite score while Ionicons may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback