Based on 58 and 118 real audits
| Metric | iOS app | Native app preferred | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 37 | iOS app |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | iOS app |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | iOS app |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 237ms | 302ms | iOS app |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | iOS app |
iOS app outperforms Native app preferred in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Native app preferred leads in no categories.
Choose iOS app when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Native app preferred doesn't clearly lead iOS app in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 58 audited iOS app sites and 118 audited Native app preferred sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback