| Metric | iOS app | Substack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 46 | Substack |
| Accessibility | 87 | 72 | iOS app |
| Best Practices | 87 | 77 | iOS app |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 62 | iOS app |
| TTFB | 231ms | 228ms | Substack |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | iOS app |
iOS app outperforms Substack in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Substack leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose iOS app when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Substack when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 62 audited iOS app sites and 2 audited Substack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback