Based on 4 and 61 real audits
| Metric | ipify | Windows Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 45 | Windows Server |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | ipify |
| Best Practices | 83 | 85 | Windows Server |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 65 | Windows Server |
| TTFB | 730ms | 542ms | Windows Server |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Windows Server outperforms ipify in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). ipify leads in accessibility.
Choose ipify when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Windows Server when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited ipify sites and 61 audited Windows Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback