| Metric | iubenda | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 52 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 90 | 87 | iubenda |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | iubenda |
| Security | 66 | 67 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 225ms | 477ms | iubenda |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Nginx |
iubenda and Nginx are closely matched, each leading in different categories. iubenda has a composite score of 73 while Nginx scores 74.
Choose iubenda when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 22 audited iubenda sites and 967 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback