| Metric | iubenda | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 52 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 90 | 87 | iubenda |
| SEO | 94 | 91 | iubenda |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 221ms | 480ms | iubenda |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
iubenda outperforms Nginx in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Nginx leads in performance.
Choose iubenda when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 24 audited iubenda sites and 982 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback