| Metric | Java | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 373ms | 368ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Java in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Java leads in no categories.
Java doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 219 audited Java sites and 3463 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback