| Metric | Jekyll | Plausible | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 82 | 57 | Jekyll |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Jekyll |
| Best Practices | 99 | 92 | Jekyll |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Jekyll |
| Security | 63 | 64 | Plausible |
| TTFB | 273ms | 202ms | Plausible |
| Composite | 79 | 75 | Jekyll |
Jekyll outperforms Plausible in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). Plausible leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Jekyll when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Plausible when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 11 audited Jekyll sites and 66 audited Plausible sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback