Skip to content

Jekyll vs Ruby

Based on 11 and 77 real audits

View Jekyll details | View Ruby details
MetricJekyllRubyWinner
Performance8257Jekyll
Accessibility8886Jekyll
Best Practices9992Jekyll
SEO9491Jekyll
Security6367Ruby
TTFB273ms337msJekyll
Composite7975Jekyll
Performance
Jekyll
82
Ruby
57
Accessibility
Jekyll
88
Ruby
86
Security
Jekyll
63
Ruby
67
SEO
Jekyll
94
Ruby
91
Composite
Jekyll
79
Ruby
75

Jekyll outperforms Ruby in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). Ruby leads in security.

When to choose Jekyll

Choose Jekyll when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Ruby

Choose Ruby when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 11 audited Jekyll sites and 77 audited Ruby sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Jekyll or Ruby?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Jekyll sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (82 vs 57 on average).
Which has better security, Jekyll or Ruby?
Ruby sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Jekyll or Ruby?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Jekyll (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Jekyll or Ruby?
Jekyll sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Jekyll or Ruby?
Jekyll sites show lower Time to First Byte (273 ms vs 337 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Jekyll or Ruby for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Jekyll scores higher on overall composite score while Jekyll may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback