Based on 7 and 2360 real audits
| Metric | Jetpack Boost | jQuery | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 46 | Jetpack Boost |
| Accessibility | 92 | 86 | Jetpack Boost |
| Best Practices | 90 | 88 | Jetpack Boost |
| SEO | 96 | 91 | Jetpack Boost |
| Security | 72 | 68 | Jetpack Boost |
| TTFB | 285ms | 554ms | Jetpack Boost |
| Composite | 79 | 75 | Jetpack Boost |
Jetpack Boost outperforms jQuery in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). jQuery leads in no categories.
Choose Jetpack Boost when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
jQuery doesn't clearly lead Jetpack Boost in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Jetpack Boost sites and 2360 audited jQuery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback