Based on 4 and 408 real audits
| Metric | Jetpack Boost | jQuery Migrate | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 45 | Jetpack Boost |
| Accessibility | 91 | 87 | Jetpack Boost |
| Best Practices | 82 | 87 | jQuery Migrate |
| SEO | 98 | 90 | Jetpack Boost |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Jetpack Boost |
| TTFB | 310ms | 527ms | Jetpack Boost |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Jetpack Boost |
Jetpack Boost outperforms jQuery Migrate in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). jQuery Migrate leads in best practices.
Choose Jetpack Boost when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose jQuery Migrate when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Jetpack Boost sites and 408 audited jQuery Migrate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback