Based on 542 and 5 real audits
| Metric | jQuery Migrate | Kadence WP Kadence | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 68 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Accessibility | 87 | 98 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Best Practices | 88 | 94 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Security | 69 | 75 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| TTFB | 662ms | 637ms | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Composite | 76 | 82 | Kadence WP Kadence |
Kadence WP Kadence outperforms jQuery Migrate in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 76). jQuery Migrate leads in no categories.
jQuery Migrate doesn't clearly lead Kadence WP Kadence in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Kadence WP Kadence when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 542 audited jQuery Migrate sites and 5 audited Kadence WP Kadence sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback