Skip to content

jQuery Migrate vs Retina.js

Based on 586 and 4 real audits

View jQuery Migrate details | View Retina.js details
MetricjQuery MigrateRetina.jsWinner
Performance4744jQuery Migrate
Accessibility8784jQuery Migrate
Best Practices8982jQuery Migrate
SEO9186jQuery Migrate
Security7063jQuery Migrate
TTFB796ms638msRetina.js
Composite7674jQuery Migrate
Performance
jQuery Migrate
47
Retina.js
44
Accessibility
jQuery Migrate
87
Retina.js
84
Security
jQuery Migrate
70
Retina.js
63
SEO
jQuery Migrate
91
Retina.js
86
Composite
jQuery Migrate
76
Retina.js
74

jQuery Migrate outperforms Retina.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Retina.js leads in TTFB.

When to choose jQuery Migrate

Choose jQuery Migrate when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Retina.js

Choose Retina.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 586 audited jQuery Migrate sites and 4 audited Retina.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery Migrate or Retina.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, jQuery Migrate sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery Migrate or Retina.js?
jQuery Migrate sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery Migrate or Retina.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jQuery Migrate (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery Migrate or Retina.js?
jQuery Migrate sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery Migrate or Retina.js?
Retina.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (638 ms vs 796 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery Migrate or Retina.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. jQuery Migrate scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery Migrate may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback