| Metric | jQuery Migrate | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 48 | RSS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | RSS |
| Best Practices | 86 | 88 | RSS |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | RSS |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 408ms | 326ms | RSS |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
RSS outperforms jQuery Migrate in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). jQuery Migrate leads in no categories.
jQuery Migrate doesn't clearly lead RSS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose RSS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 367 audited jQuery Migrate sites and 856 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback