Based on 387 and 1 real audits
| Metric | jQuery Migrate | Twenty Twelve | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 95 | Twenty Twelve |
| Accessibility | 87 | 98 | Twenty Twelve |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | jQuery Migrate |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Twenty Twelve |
| Security | 66 | 60 | jQuery Migrate |
| TTFB | 453ms | 274ms | Twenty Twelve |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Twenty Twelve |
Twenty Twelve outperforms jQuery Migrate in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). jQuery Migrate leads in best practices, security.
Choose jQuery Migrate when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twelve when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 387 audited jQuery Migrate sites and 1 audited Twenty Twelve sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback