Based on 542 and 1 real audits
| Metric | jQuery Migrate | Twenty Twenty-One | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 59 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| Accessibility | 87 | 94 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| Best Practices | 88 | 96 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | jQuery Migrate |
| Security | 69 | 63 | jQuery Migrate |
| TTFB | 662ms | 503ms | Twenty Twenty-One |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | jQuery Migrate |
Twenty Twenty-One outperforms jQuery Migrate in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 76). jQuery Migrate leads in SEO, security, composite score.
Choose jQuery Migrate when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twenty-One when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 542 audited jQuery Migrate sites and 1 audited Twenty Twenty-One sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback