Based on 2 and 431 real audits
| Metric | jQuery Mobile | jQuery UI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 62 | 42 | jQuery Mobile |
| Accessibility | 85 | 87 | jQuery UI |
| Best Practices | 90 | 88 | jQuery Mobile |
| SEO | 96 | 90 | jQuery Mobile |
| Security | 66 | 67 | jQuery UI |
| TTFB | 491ms | 506ms | jQuery Mobile |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | jQuery Mobile |
jQuery Mobile outperforms jQuery UI in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). jQuery UI leads in accessibility, security.
Choose jQuery Mobile when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited jQuery Mobile sites and 431 audited jQuery UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback