Based on 2 and 263 real audits
| Metric | jQuery-pjax | Modernizr | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 44 | Modernizr |
| Accessibility | 93 | 85 | jQuery-pjax |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 88 | 90 | Modernizr |
| Security | 62 | 64 | Modernizr |
| TTFB | 43ms | 400ms | jQuery-pjax |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Modernizr |
Modernizr outperforms jQuery-pjax in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). jQuery-pjax leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose jQuery-pjax when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Modernizr when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited jQuery-pjax sites and 263 audited Modernizr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback