Based on 3 and 649 real audits
| Metric | jQuery-pjax | OneTrust | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 34 | OneTrust |
| Accessibility | 86 | 90 | OneTrust |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | OneTrust |
| SEO | 86 | 90 | OneTrust |
| Security | 67 | 66 | jQuery-pjax |
| TTFB | 119ms | 275ms | jQuery-pjax |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | OneTrust |
OneTrust outperforms jQuery-pjax in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). jQuery-pjax leads in security, TTFB.
Choose jQuery-pjax when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose OneTrust when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited jQuery-pjax sites and 649 audited OneTrust sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback