Based on 2 and 3463 real audits
| Metric | jQuery-pjax | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 93 | 89 | jQuery-pjax |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 88 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 62 | 67 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 43ms | 368ms | jQuery-pjax |
| Composite | 70 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms jQuery-pjax in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). jQuery-pjax leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose jQuery-pjax when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited jQuery-pjax sites and 3463 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback