Skip to content

jQuery UI vs List.js

Based on 381 and 13 real audits

View jQuery UI details | View List.js details
MetricjQuery UIList.jsWinner
Performance4245List.js
Accessibility8779jQuery UI
Best Practices8791List.js
SEO9085jQuery UI
Security6565Tie
TTFB466ms474msjQuery UI
Composite7373Tie
Performance
jQuery UI
42
List.js
45
Accessibility
jQuery UI
87
List.js
79
Security
jQuery UI
65
List.js
65
SEO
jQuery UI
90
List.js
85
Composite
jQuery UI
73
List.js
73

jQuery UI outperforms List.js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). List.js leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose jQuery UI

Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose List.js

Choose List.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 381 audited jQuery UI sites and 13 audited List.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery UI or List.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, List.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery UI or List.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery UI or List.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jQuery UI (87 vs 79). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery UI or List.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery UI or List.js?
jQuery UI sites show lower Time to First Byte (466 ms vs 474 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery UI or List.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. List.js scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback