Skip to content

jQuery UI vs List.js

Based on 524 and 14 real audits

MetricjQuery UIList.jsWinner
Performance4548List.js
Accessibility8880jQuery UI
Best Practices8991List.js
SEO9086jQuery UI
Security6966jQuery UI
TTFB710ms468msList.js
Composite7574jQuery UI
Performance
jQuery UI
45
List.js
48
Accessibility
jQuery UI
88
List.js
80
Security
jQuery UI
69
List.js
66
SEO
jQuery UI
90
List.js
86
Composite
jQuery UI
75
List.js
74

jQuery UI outperforms List.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). List.js leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose jQuery UI

Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose List.js

Choose List.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 524 audited jQuery UI sites and 14 audited List.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery UI or List.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, List.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery UI or List.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery UI or List.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jQuery UI (88 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery UI or List.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery UI or List.js?
List.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (468 ms vs 710 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery UI or List.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. List.js scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback