Skip to content

jQuery UI vs mobile-detect.js

Based on 431 and 3 real audits

View jQuery UI details | View mobile-detect.js details
MetricjQuery UImobile-detect.jsWinner
Performance4245mobile-detect.js
Accessibility8789mobile-detect.js
Best Practices8877jQuery UI
SEO9083jQuery UI
Security6775mobile-detect.js
TTFB506ms80msmobile-detect.js
Composite7476mobile-detect.js
Performance
jQuery UI
42
mobile-detect.js
45
Accessibility
jQuery UI
87
mobile-detect.js
89
Security
jQuery UI
67
mobile-detect.js
75
SEO
jQuery UI
90
mobile-detect.js
83
Composite
jQuery UI
74
mobile-detect.js
76

mobile-detect.js outperforms jQuery UI in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). jQuery UI leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose jQuery UI

Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose mobile-detect.js

Choose mobile-detect.js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 431 audited jQuery UI sites and 3 audited mobile-detect.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, mobile-detect.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js?
mobile-detect.js sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor mobile-detect.js (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js?
mobile-detect.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (80 ms vs 506 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery UI or mobile-detect.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. mobile-detect.js scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback