Based on 431 and 4 real audits
| Metric | jQuery UI | Nette Framework | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 50 | Nette Framework |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Nette Framework |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | Nette Framework |
| SEO | 90 | 93 | Nette Framework |
| Security | 67 | 74 | Nette Framework |
| TTFB | 506ms | 385ms | Nette Framework |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Nette Framework |
Nette Framework outperforms jQuery UI in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). jQuery UI leads in no categories.
jQuery UI doesn't clearly lead Nette Framework in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Nette Framework when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 431 audited jQuery UI sites and 4 audited Nette Framework sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback