Based on 400 and 75 real audits
| Metric | jQuery UI | RequireJS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 43 | RequireJS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 85 | jQuery UI |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | jQuery UI |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | jQuery UI |
| TTFB | 462ms | 382ms | RequireJS |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
jQuery UI outperforms RequireJS in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). RequireJS leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose RequireJS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 400 audited jQuery UI sites and 75 audited RequireJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback