Skip to content

jQuery UI vs spin.js

Based on 381 and 10 real audits

View jQuery UI details | View spin.js details
MetricjQuery UIspin.jsWinner
Performance4249spin.js
Accessibility8785jQuery UI
Best Practices8785jQuery UI
SEO9092spin.js
Security6561jQuery UI
TTFB466ms266msspin.js
Composite7372jQuery UI
Performance
jQuery UI
42
spin.js
49
Accessibility
jQuery UI
87
spin.js
85
Security
jQuery UI
65
spin.js
61
SEO
jQuery UI
90
spin.js
92
Composite
jQuery UI
73
spin.js
72

jQuery UI outperforms spin.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). spin.js leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose jQuery UI

Choose jQuery UI when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose spin.js

Choose spin.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 381 audited jQuery UI sites and 10 audited spin.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery UI or spin.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, spin.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery UI or spin.js?
jQuery UI sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery UI or spin.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jQuery UI (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery UI or spin.js?
spin.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery UI or spin.js?
spin.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (266 ms vs 466 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery UI or spin.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. spin.js scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback