Skip to content

jQuery vs List.js

Based on 2080 and 14 real audits

View jQuery details | View List.js details
MetricjQueryList.jsWinner
Performance4548List.js
Accessibility8680jQuery
Best Practices8791List.js
SEO9086jQuery
Security6666Tie
TTFB474ms468msList.js
Composite7474Tie
Performance
jQuery
45
List.js
48
Accessibility
jQuery
86
List.js
80
Security
jQuery
66
List.js
66
SEO
jQuery
90
List.js
86
Composite
jQuery
74
List.js
74

List.js outperforms jQuery in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). jQuery leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose jQuery

Choose jQuery when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose List.js

Choose List.js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2080 audited jQuery sites and 14 audited List.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery or List.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, List.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery or List.js?
jQuery sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery or List.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jQuery (86 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery or List.js?
jQuery sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery or List.js?
List.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (468 ms vs 474 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery or List.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. List.js scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback