Based on 1895 and 1 real audits
| Metric | jQuery | Locomotive Scroll | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 55 | Locomotive Scroll |
| Accessibility | 86 | 84 | jQuery |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Locomotive Scroll |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | jQuery |
| Security | 65 | 62 | jQuery |
| TTFB | 442ms | 441ms | Locomotive Scroll |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | jQuery |
jQuery outperforms Locomotive Scroll in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Locomotive Scroll leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.
Choose jQuery when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Locomotive Scroll when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1895 audited jQuery sites and 1 audited Locomotive Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback