Skip to content

jQuery vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 1841 and 134 real audits

View jQuery details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricjQueryMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance4552Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8688Matomo Analytics
Best Practices8789Matomo Analytics
SEO9090Tie
Security6465Matomo Analytics
TTFB433ms430msMatomo Analytics
Composite7374Matomo Analytics
Performance
jQuery
45
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
jQuery
86
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
jQuery
64
Matomo Analytics
65
SEO
jQuery
90
Matomo Analytics
90
Composite
jQuery
73
Matomo Analytics
74

Matomo Analytics outperforms jQuery in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). jQuery leads in no categories.

When to choose jQuery

jQuery doesn't clearly lead Matomo Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1841 audited jQuery sites and 134 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery or Matomo Analytics?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Matomo Analytics (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery or Matomo Analytics?
jQuery sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery or Matomo Analytics?
Matomo Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (430 ms vs 433 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback