| Metric | jQuery | Moment.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 37 | jQuery |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | jQuery |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | jQuery |
| Security | 65 | 64 | jQuery |
| TTFB | 438ms | 495ms | jQuery |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | jQuery |
jQuery outperforms Moment.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Moment.js leads in no categories.
Choose jQuery when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Moment.js doesn't clearly lead jQuery in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1857 audited jQuery sites and 110 audited Moment.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback