Skip to content

jQuery vs New Relic

Based on 1857 and 177 real audits

View jQuery details | View New Relic details
MetricjQueryNew RelicWinner
Performance4535jQuery
Accessibility8689New Relic
Best Practices8785jQuery
SEO9090Tie
Security6565Tie
TTFB438ms236msNew Relic
Composite7372jQuery
Performance
jQuery
45
New Relic
35
Accessibility
jQuery
86
New Relic
89
Security
jQuery
65
New Relic
65
SEO
jQuery
90
New Relic
90
Composite
jQuery
73
New Relic
72

jQuery outperforms New Relic in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). New Relic leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose jQuery

Choose jQuery when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1857 audited jQuery sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, jQuery sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery or New Relic?
jQuery sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery or New Relic?
jQuery sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery or New Relic?
New Relic sites show lower Time to First Byte (236 ms vs 438 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. jQuery scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback