Based on 2082 and 64 real audits
| Metric | jQuery | Ruby on Rails | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 53 | Ruby on Rails |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 91 | Ruby on Rails |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Ruby on Rails |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Ruby on Rails |
| TTFB | 474ms | 325ms | Ruby on Rails |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Ruby on Rails |
Ruby on Rails outperforms jQuery in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). jQuery leads in no categories.
jQuery doesn't clearly lead Ruby on Rails in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Ruby on Rails when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2082 audited jQuery sites and 64 audited Ruby on Rails sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback