Skip to content

jQuery vs Twenty Seventeen

Based on 1824 and 1 real audits

View jQuery details | View Twenty Seventeen details
MetricjQueryTwenty SeventeenWinner
Performance4581Twenty Seventeen
Accessibility8696Twenty Seventeen
Best Practices87100Twenty Seventeen
SEO9092Twenty Seventeen
Security6483Twenty Seventeen
TTFB432ms797msjQuery
Composite7385Twenty Seventeen
Performance
jQuery
45
Twenty Seventeen
81
Accessibility
jQuery
86
Twenty Seventeen
96
Security
jQuery
64
Twenty Seventeen
83
SEO
jQuery
90
Twenty Seventeen
92
Composite
jQuery
73
Twenty Seventeen
85

Twenty Seventeen outperforms jQuery in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 73). jQuery leads in TTFB.

When to choose jQuery

Choose jQuery when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Twenty Seventeen

Choose Twenty Seventeen when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1824 audited jQuery sites and 1 audited Twenty Seventeen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, jQuery or Twenty Seventeen?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Twenty Seventeen sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (81 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, jQuery or Twenty Seventeen?
Twenty Seventeen sites score higher on security analysis (83 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jQuery or Twenty Seventeen?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Twenty Seventeen (96 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jQuery or Twenty Seventeen?
Twenty Seventeen sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jQuery or Twenty Seventeen?
jQuery sites show lower Time to First Byte (432 ms vs 797 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jQuery or Twenty Seventeen for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Twenty Seventeen scores higher on overall composite score while jQuery may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback