| Metric | JS.org | Netlify CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 90 | 62 | JS.org |
| Accessibility | 100 | 90 | JS.org |
| Best Practices | 96 | 92 | JS.org |
| SEO | 100 | 95 | JS.org |
| Security | 59 | 69 | Netlify CDN |
| TTFB | 315ms | 360ms | JS.org |
| Composite | 78 | 77 | JS.org |
JS.org outperforms Netlify CDN in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 77). Netlify CDN leads in security.
Choose JS.org when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Netlify CDN when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited JS.org sites and 56 audited Netlify CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback