Skip to content

jsPDF vs PHP

Based on 1 and 1215 real audits

MetricjsPDFPHPWinner
Performance5648jsPDF
Accessibility10088jsPDF
Best Practices7788PHP
SEO9291jsPDF
Security5367PHP
TTFB850ms473msPHP
Composite7575Tie
Performance
jsPDF
56
PHP
48
Accessibility
jsPDF
100
PHP
88
Security
jsPDF
53
PHP
67
SEO
jsPDF
92
PHP
91
Composite
jsPDF
75
PHP
75

jsPDF and PHP are closely matched, each leading in different categories. jsPDF has a composite score of 75 while PHP scores 75.

When to choose jsPDF

Choose jsPDF when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited jsPDF sites and 1215 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, jsPDF or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, jsPDF sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, jsPDF or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 53 on average).
Which has better accessibility, jsPDF or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor jsPDF (100 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, jsPDF or PHP?
jsPDF sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), jsPDF or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (473 ms vs 850 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose jsPDF or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. jsPDF scores higher on overall composite score while jsPDF may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback