| Metric | Judge.me | Klaviyo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 28 | Judge.me |
| Accessibility | 91 | 87 | Judge.me |
| Best Practices | 81 | 80 | Judge.me |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Judge.me |
| Security | 75 | 70 | Judge.me |
| TTFB | 283ms | 223ms | Klaviyo |
| Composite | 76 | 73 | Judge.me |
Judge.me outperforms Klaviyo in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Klaviyo leads in TTFB.
Choose Judge.me when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Klaviyo when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Judge.me sites and 48 audited Klaviyo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback