Skip to content

Juicer vs New Relic

Based on 4 and 177 real audits

View Juicer details | View New Relic details
MetricJuicerNew RelicWinner
Performance3035New Relic
Accessibility8589New Relic
Best Practices8285New Relic
SEO9090Tie
Security6365New Relic
TTFB638ms236msNew Relic
Composite7172New Relic
Performance
Juicer
30
New Relic
35
Accessibility
Juicer
85
New Relic
89
Security
Juicer
63
New Relic
65
SEO
Juicer
90
New Relic
90
Composite
Juicer
71
New Relic
72

New Relic outperforms Juicer in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Juicer leads in no categories.

When to choose Juicer

Juicer doesn't clearly lead New Relic in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Juicer sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Juicer or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, New Relic sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Juicer or New Relic?
New Relic sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Juicer or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Juicer or New Relic?
Juicer sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Juicer or New Relic?
New Relic sites show lower Time to First Byte (236 ms vs 638 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Juicer or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. New Relic scores higher on overall composite score while Juicer may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback