Based on 3 and 918 real audits
| Metric | Kadence WP Blocks | WordPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 61 | 48 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| SEO | 97 | 91 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Security | 75 | 68 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| TTFB | 367ms | 449ms | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Composite | 82 | 76 | Kadence WP Blocks |
Kadence WP Blocks outperforms WordPress in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 76). WordPress leads in no categories.
Choose Kadence WP Blocks when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
WordPress doesn't clearly lead Kadence WP Blocks in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Kadence WP Blocks sites and 918 audited WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback