Skip to content

Kakao vs Naver Analytics

Based on 6 and 39 real audits

View Kakao details | View Naver Analytics details
MetricKakaoNaver AnalyticsWinner
Performance3536Naver Analytics
Accessibility7989Naver Analytics
Best Practices8485Naver Analytics
SEO9193Naver Analytics
Security5965Naver Analytics
TTFB1150ms454msNaver Analytics
Composite6772Naver Analytics
Performance
Kakao
35
Naver Analytics
36
Accessibility
Kakao
79
Naver Analytics
89
Security
Kakao
59
Naver Analytics
65
SEO
Kakao
91
Naver Analytics
93
Composite
Kakao
67
Naver Analytics
72

Naver Analytics outperforms Kakao in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 67). Kakao leads in no categories.

When to choose Kakao

Kakao doesn't clearly lead Naver Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Naver Analytics

Choose Naver Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 6 audited Kakao sites and 39 audited Naver Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Kakao or Naver Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Naver Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Kakao or Naver Analytics?
Naver Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 59 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Kakao or Naver Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Naver Analytics (89 vs 79). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Kakao or Naver Analytics?
Naver Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Kakao or Naver Analytics?
Naver Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (454 ms vs 1150 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Kakao or Naver Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Naver Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Kakao may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback