| Metric | Kaltura | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 49 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 90 | 93 | Open Graph |
| Security | 62 | 69 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 364ms | 416ms | Kaltura |
| Composite | 71 | 76 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Kaltura in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 71). Kaltura leads in TTFB.
Choose Kaltura when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Kaltura sites and 4135 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback