| Metric | Kasada | React Router | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 40 | React Router |
| Accessibility | 95 | 91 | Kasada |
| Best Practices | 74 | 86 | React Router |
| SEO | 96 | 94 | Kasada |
| Security | 62 | 69 | React Router |
| TTFB | 922ms | 271ms | React Router |
| Composite | 71 | 75 | React Router |
React Router outperforms Kasada in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Kasada leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Kasada when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Router when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Kasada sites and 139 audited React Router sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback