Based on 48 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Klaviyo | Klaviyo Customer Hub | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 27 | Klaviyo |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Klaviyo Customer Hub |
| Best Practices | 80 | 83 | Klaviyo Customer Hub |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | Klaviyo Customer Hub |
| Security | 70 | 71 | Klaviyo Customer Hub |
| TTFB | 223ms | 131ms | Klaviyo Customer Hub |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Klaviyo |
Klaviyo Customer Hub outperforms Klaviyo in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Klaviyo leads in performance, composite score.
Choose Klaviyo when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Klaviyo Customer Hub when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Klaviyo sites and 3 audited Klaviyo Customer Hub sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback