| Metric | Klaviyo | Tolstoy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 22 | Klaviyo |
| Accessibility | 87 | 76 | Klaviyo |
| Best Practices | 80 | 81 | Tolstoy |
| SEO | 91 | 96 | Tolstoy |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 223ms | 414ms | Klaviyo |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Klaviyo outperforms Tolstoy in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Tolstoy leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Klaviyo when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tolstoy when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Klaviyo sites and 4 audited Tolstoy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback