Skip to content

Kochava vs Proofpoint

Based on 3 and 359 real audits

View Kochava details | View Proofpoint details
MetricKochavaProofpointWinner
Performance3735Kochava
Accessibility9789Kochava
Best Practices9785Kochava
SEO10089Kochava
Security6266Proofpoint
TTFB110ms314msKochava
Composite7172Proofpoint
Performance
Kochava
37
Proofpoint
35
Accessibility
Kochava
97
Proofpoint
89
Security
Kochava
62
Proofpoint
66
SEO
Kochava
100
Proofpoint
89
Composite
Kochava
71
Proofpoint
72

Kochava outperforms Proofpoint in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Proofpoint leads in security, composite score.

When to choose Kochava

Choose Kochava when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Proofpoint

Choose Proofpoint when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Kochava sites and 359 audited Proofpoint sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Kochava or Proofpoint?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Kochava sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Kochava or Proofpoint?
Proofpoint sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Kochava or Proofpoint?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kochava (97 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Kochava or Proofpoint?
Kochava sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Kochava or Proofpoint?
Kochava sites show lower Time to First Byte (110 ms vs 314 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Kochava or Proofpoint for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Kochava scores higher on overall composite score while Kochava may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback