| Metric | Laravel | October CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 64 | October CMS |
| Accessibility | 83 | 73 | Laravel |
| Best Practices | 91 | 92 | October CMS |
| SEO | 95 | 92 | Laravel |
| Security | 65 | 77 | October CMS |
| TTFB | 1025ms | 243ms | October CMS |
| Composite | 74 | 81 | October CMS |
October CMS outperforms Laravel in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 74). Laravel leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Laravel when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose October CMS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 21 audited Laravel sites and 1 audited October CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback