Based on 246 and 3465 real audits
| Metric | LazySizes | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 44 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | LazySizes |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | LazySizes |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 427ms | 367ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Open Graph outperforms LazySizes in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). LazySizes leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose LazySizes when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 246 audited LazySizes sites and 3465 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback