Based on 3 and 110 real audits
| Metric | LeanData | LottieFiles | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 97 | 89 | LeanData |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 62 | 68 | LottieFiles |
| TTFB | 245ms | 373ms | LeanData |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | LottieFiles |
LeanData and LottieFiles are closely matched, each leading in different categories. LeanData has a composite score of 72 while LottieFiles scores 74.
Choose LeanData when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose LottieFiles when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited LeanData sites and 110 audited LottieFiles sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback