Based on 3 and 97 real audits
| Metric | LeanData | LottieFiles | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | LeanData |
| Best Practices | 97 | 88 | LeanData |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 62 | 67 | LottieFiles |
| TTFB | 245ms | 381ms | LeanData |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | LottieFiles |
LeanData outperforms LottieFiles in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). LottieFiles leads in security, composite score.
Choose LeanData when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose LottieFiles when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited LeanData sites and 97 audited LottieFiles sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback