| Metric | Lede | Next.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 43 | Next.js |
| Accessibility | 97 | 91 | Lede |
| Best Practices | 73 | 89 | Next.js |
| SEO | 100 | 94 | Lede |
| Security | 64 | 69 | Next.js |
| TTFB | 315ms | 344ms | Lede |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Lede and Next.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Lede has a composite score of 75 while Next.js scores 75.
Choose Lede when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Lede sites and 704 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback