Based on 1 and 3463 real audits
| Metric | Lemon Squeezy | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 45 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Accessibility | 100 | 89 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Best Practices | 96 | 87 | Lemon Squeezy |
| SEO | 83 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 59 | 67 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 242ms | 368ms | Lemon Squeezy |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Open Graph |
Lemon Squeezy outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). Open Graph leads in SEO, security, composite score.
Choose Lemon Squeezy when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Lemon Squeezy sites and 3463 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback